About Me

Name: Scotty - Denver
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Haiti - Manmade disaster?

It's not too Politically Correct to suggest that maybe we created this disaster ourselves, but somebody needs to point out some facts about Haiti.  I recently posted a blog entry where I showed that since over 97% of the forests in Haiti have been removed, the land left behind has been ravaged.  The people are starving because they cannot grow anything and there are no fish around the island because the reefs have been killed by soil erosion.  This has led to a large, make that HUGE influx of folks into the populated areas (Port Au Prince) where they are dependent upon food aid.  The  overcrowding, the lack of standards for building and such led directly _and_ indirectly to all those structures collapsing in the earthquake with such a great loss of life.

When I first heard about the disaster in Haiti it sounded like 20-50k people had lost their lives.  The more I listened to reports, the more it sounded like about 1/10 of the folks in that populous area had lost their lives.  That's 300k people lost their lives!  The Red Cross estimates are currently at about 200k killed in this devastating earthquake.  Their number is likely to grow towards my estimate.

This is a terrible human tragedy, but one that could have been somewhat avoided.  It is the responsibility of the rest of the world now to see this type of thing does not happen again.  We must rebuild Haiti, take the lessons from there and apply them elsewhere (Africa!).  We can rebuild properly in Haiti, but we must rebuild (and build!) elsewhere as well to prevent this type of disaster.

Pressure must be brought on those who have (Oil rich nations) to help those who have not.  Aid and support must flow from technology rich nations to those who have little.  We must help them reforest to help them make their land rich and supportive again.  We can turn deserts into lush farmlands.  We have the technology, we must do this.  As a Christian, I am dedicated to that proposition.  I pray The Lord will use me and my wife, our resources, to help these countries that desperately need the help to rebuild their infrastructure.  That will bring hope.  That's putting the "rubber" of The Gospel on the road.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Financial Crisis - NOT Over?

Read this article, and then decide if we're _really_ out of the recession, and whether we will return to economic growth, or business as usual.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/opinion/10rich.html

I'm absolutely appalled at some of the facts he points out, things I knew little about, but I'm learning.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An "Inconvenient" Truth

It was proved already that what Al Gore said yesterday about "The Polar cap may melt in 5 years" was not based on any science (scientific evidence, research, etc...) at all.  The guy is just blowing smoke like a politician still.  I can't believe he got a Nobel Peace Prize.  That's almost as lame as a President getting a NPP and then justifying war.

But, the world doesn't have to make sense does it?  It's not based on "truth!"

What you can read today about Global Warming:

NASA's latest predictions indicate cooling NOT warming.
Ah, and remember this important fact, conveniently hidden by NPR and the other GW propagandists. It is from the latest National Geographic Publication:
Mars [ice cap] Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html

The latest polls now show that a large majority of the US population no longer believe that global warming is man-made.
Of course, hundreds of scientists including many dozens of top professors from the world’s leading universities have signed petitions positing that global warming advocates have no solid science behind them.

Yet another stupid agenda out the window - into the COLD.  Now let’s see if the politicians still go forward with their agenda.

NASA sunspot activity prediction indicates next decade coldest in over a century [FR Exclusive]
Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA ^ | December 13, 2009 | nwrep

http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml

Enjoy!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bruce Springsteen Backs Gay Marriage in NJ

OK, well then I'll never goto a Springsteen concert or buy a Springsteen album.  It's my right to vote with my feet if I so choose.  If he is choosing to be politician, then I won't vote for him in other words.  I did the same thing to Elton John when EJ had Boy Scouts stripping on stage at one of his concerts.  It's called going over the line.  Society calls it Post-Modernism.  I call it disgusting.  On the day I heard about EJ doing that, I threw away all my EJ albums and vowed never to purchase another one by him.

Does anybody else feel like that?  Is it important to put our "rubber" where the road is?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Patriotism In America

OK, the daily topic is Patriotism.  Sadly, Patriotism has gone out of style.  While it may be true that we are becoming more "global-minded" in our citizenship, I still think it's a good thing to be patriotic and recite the Pledge of Allegiance and salute the flag and things like that.  I read this morning that a fellow, a Medal of Honor winner, 90 years old in Richmond, Virginia, is being ordered by his homeowner's association to remove his flagpole.

Now, first of all, isn't expressing our patriotism a "right" under the Constitution?  Isn't it part of the First Amendment just like pornography and all that other crap that people pass off as "art" these days?  And what about blogging and sounding off, is patriotism any less than that?  Is it "OK" for the liberals to promote indecent exposure and sex with children (what's the name of that organization NAMBLA?) while those of us who believe in the Bible, and everything decent are not allowed to express those things?  Patriotism is a good and decent thing and I think that the ACLU should be guaranteeing that fellow his RIGHT to display his flag no matter what the HOA says!

Instead the ACLU gets behind legislation where ONE PERSON objects to a war memorial because there is a cross in it and it's on public land.  I think that the left-leaning liberals in the ACLU should take a long look at themselves and decide whether the wants of the few really outweigh the needs of the many.  Should one person be able to dictate laws to the rest of us in this country?  Was it really correct to remove prayer from schools because a few Athiests got together and decided they didn't want it?

I've had ENOUGH of the ACLU!  Who do they think they are?  I can say what I darned well please in a public place, and I can display a Nativity scene in front of my house if I want.  Cities can even display them on city property.  Why not?  The fact that the founding fathers of this country removed all references to "God" from the Constitution should not denote to anyone that they believed a God-less society was to be desired, rather what they were striving for was a place where people could worship God as they pleased, or didn't.  I think we should file a lawsuit against the ACLU for trying to remove our heritage from our public monuments and places of law.

It's CRIMINAL in my mind what they've done over the past 50 or so years in this country.  We've seen increasing moral decay, and a shift away from the church as a place of "hope" to looking to the government for hope, and a handout.  Organizations like ACORN display to us the WORST in government, and government backed assistance programs.  We can also look to the lottery.  50 years ago, there was no lottery.  Then suddenly, along with gambling on Indian Reservations, came this thing called the lottery.  It was going to be a panacea that would magically cure the shortfalls in government coffers, while providing a chance at wealth and happiness for millions of folks.

It's false hope is all it is, criminal in my mind.  I used to live in California where they first had the lottery back in the 1980's.  I used to drive through Watts on the way home from work and see these lines stretching for blocks around the liquor stores.  All those folks would be in line waiting to buy lottery tickets, because the "prize" had grown to several millions of dollars.  The TV crews would go and interview those folks, and every one of them to a person would say something like "When I win I'm gonna ..."  I tell you, it's criminal what the government has done, instituting a system of false hope for the poor.  Do you think the rich play the lottery?  NO WAY!  It's only poor folks, and some middle class probably, thinking they'll "get rich quick" and be happy for the rest of their lives.  Face it, the lottery is a tax!

There are many stories of lottery winners being broke after a few short years of "high living" or having their money stolen from them by unscrupulous investment counselors and such.  It used to be in America that people looked to the Church for help and hope.  That was up until the FDR administration and the "New Deal."  We trained up a whole generation of leaders in WWII who came back after the war and created a prosperous and wealthy nation, one that became enamored of "consumerism."  We built an economy that had to entice everyone in the lower and middle classes to spend every nickel they earned on the promise of getting the "newest, best, and most advanced" products available.  No matter what it is, you can still find nearly every product around touting those familiar claims of "New and improved!"

And somehow or other, we have gotten to the point where a HOA is trying to make it illegal to express patriotism?  How in the heck did that happen?  We've not become new and improved we've gotten sloppy and lazy is all we've done.  Get mad!  Get out there and tell folks you aren't gonna take it anymore!  Write letters to your congressman and senators, use your rights to preserve and protect what's decent and good in this country before it's too late!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The USPS Broke My Heart

This may not come as a surprise to many, but I had an experience a couple years back and thought I should document it.  I found a cute little set of "Coca-cola" village pieces on eBay, and the price was right, and the lady selling them said she'd be happy to combine the shipping on them, so I bid on several and won 5 of them.  They were packed carefully, and shipped during the month of December.  I intended to add those pieces to our Christmas Village.  The fact that they were all Coca-cola was great, since Cheryl is a HUGE Coca-cola collectibles fan.

Anyhow, the box arrived with all the pieces in it, and it appeared to have been dropped.  One corner was clearly damaged.  We decided to open it up and see.  Every single piece inside the box was crushed, it appeared the box was dropped onto concrete from at least a height of 20 feet, even in spite of the markings on every side of the box that the contents were "FRAGILE."  I'm reminded of the scene from the Christmas movie classic:  "A Christmas Story" where Darrin McGavin reads the label on the box and says "Fra-geel-eh, must be French or Italian, right?"

The gorillas at the USPS tried throwing our box loaded with fragile items, and no matter how well you pack some things, if you drop them from that height, they are going to all crush themselves, and they did.  I promptly took the box, the entire box, the contents, the shipper notice, the insurance information and all to the USPS office, the guy looked at me like I was crazy.  But, he accepted it all, I walked out with my claim and never heard another word from them.  It was only a year later I remembered the incident, apparently it was so upsetting I blocked it out or something.

Anyhow, the USPS has no accountability.  If you get insurance, you still may never get your money on a fragile item.  Moral of the story:  Never ship fragile items USPS.  The gal who initially tried helping me behind the desk - before the manager got involved - said distinctly that "You should never ship anything fragile as Parcel Post."  I just won't ever ship anything fragile through the USPS ever again.

This is in the spirit of "Don't get mad - get even!"  You US Postal Service employees who broke my wife's Christmas Village pieces know who you are and you are animals!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Terrorism!

There have been two incidences lately that warrant comment. First and foremost there was the tragic incident at Ft. Hood, where a lone gunman pulled out a couple guns and started shooting people. Now, I will grant you that he acted alone, and the people he killed were mainly military. One could consider it an act of war in that light, since the targets were mainly military.

But, I choose to fall back on the definition of Terrorism: “The use of force or violence to make a political statement.” It’s pretty simple then, the only question was whether Nidal Hasan was making a political statement. We can answer that question quite simply though. If he did indeed say the words “Allahu Akbar” (“Allah is great”) right before he started shooting as so many have already testified, then it was an act of terrorism.

I would like to state that my wife and I absolutely deplore this wanton act of terrorism, and our hearts and prayers are with the families and friends of those killed in that tragic incident. It was a deplorable act, and one that brings discredit on the man – Nidal Hasan – and those associated with him.

The second incident in recent news that bears scrutiny is the decision by the Obama administration to try the 9/11 “masterminds” as civilians in a Federal Court in New York. This decision is also deplorable, and there is no excuse for giving those “terrorists” and foreigners the same rights as American citizens. Attorney General Holder’s claim that it’s “his” decision is absolutely wrong as well. The decision had already been made to hold military tribunals for all the suspects held at Gitmo. He’s just using President Obama’s (liberal) revisionist policies to change the way things work, and in essence to try to change history.

It is a shameful thing that the current administration has allowed to take place. It is further shameful, and “Politically Correct” and so on to tap dance around the issue of whether Nidal Hasan is indeed a terrorist. He _is_ a TERRORIST!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Washington Out Of Control

OK, enough is enough! We learned this week that “Health Guidelines” for women are being changed. First, it was Mammograms, now it’s Pap smears. The clear goal of this administration is to reduce cost, not focus on health.

Now we read though that FHA is giving out risky loans in “wealthy” areas. There was a fellow quoted this morning in the NY Times who said “I have no idea how we got this big of a loan.” My goodness, isn’t there any oversight of these agencies? Wasn’t that part of the package in the bailout? Less than 12 months ago, that same fellow had to cash in part of his retirement savings to move to Boston!

I tell you, things are spinning out of control, and there is no accountability anywhere. The focus in Washington has shifted to President Obama’s agenda no matter what, and nobody is watching the chicken coop. Add on top of that the big firms on Wall St. are voting themselves HUGE bonuses because of the supposed “recovery” on Wall St. That same recovery has not translated to a recovery on Main St., but do they care? Is it important to Wall St. that unemployment is still on the rise and the average American now, who doesn’t even have a subprime mortgage is now much more likely to lose his home?

This recovery has been about the wealthy, not the lower and middle classes in America. Nothing has been done to support them. I use again the case where in Colorado our Governor stated in no uncertain terms that we were going to get Federal Stimulus monies to help pay for much needed highway and bridge repairs. So, in light of that eventuality he said we should raise auto licensing fees to pay for those repairs now, we’d get the money later from the Fed. We never got a DIME!

Are we being ripped off? Heck no, we needed those repairs, but, and this is a HUGE but, don’t treat me like a fool and count those job numbers in the “jobs saved” category (which you can bet your bottom dollar they are!) by Federal Stimulus monies. The only jobs saved by Federal Stimulus money that this author can see are traders and fund managers and executives on Wall St. The same jerks who got us into this mess to begin with.

I wrote a comment today on a CNN article that at first, I agreed with the TARP program, that it was necessary to “do something.” Now that we’ve seen the results of that “something” I think it would have been better if we’d never done anything at all, and simply let those fools go down with their Wall St. ships. So what if they had gone under? I think the average Joe American would have been better off, since he would have gotten a much sweeter deal in terms of opportunity to refinance his mortgage and modify his debt.

The President and his liberals are minding the store, but the fox has left the chicken coop hours ago with all the chickens and the eggs too.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Daily Rant

Unfortunately, I have no job yet. I had a couple interviews lately, both were very positive, but I didn’t get either job. It’s kind of a drag in my situation that I’ve not been employed at any one employer for longer than 4 years out of the past 20. It makes me a “project” person now, somebody who gets hired when projects are in need, and the first to be let go when things start to tighten up again.

It really has nothing to do with my skills and talents which is the biggest bummer in the situation. I’ve wanted to get in a company where I could be part of a great team. The last place I worked again was a bit behind the curve in terms of software technology even though it was a great team, and that makes me not as “portable” which is the main reason I’ve had great interviews, but am not on their “desirable” list. It’s getting very difficult to compete anymore with the kids coming out of school, all of whom can work 26 hours a day. Me, I just don’t do that anymore, I’m slowing down as I am nearing 50. It’s probably time to figure out something else.

I’d love to goto work full time for The Lord too, but doing what? It’s a hugely uncertain time of life when you’re stuck in the place where you don’t need (or want) lots of money anymore. Heck – I just want a job! I don’t want to start completely over doing anything. I tried that 5 years ago, went back to work in something totally different (Home Depot) and I didn’t fail, but the stress of walking 8 hours a day on concrete floors nearly ruined my feet and ankles. My body is just not used to that kind of abuse. I got tendonitis in my elbows right away too from lifting doors and windows over my head. That was a lot easier to deal with than my feet though.

So, I’m not much cut out for manual labor, I’m still plenty strong, but it’s just that a constant 40 hrs/wk would likely break my body down in a hurry. I’ve not done anything else besides software in the past 25 years. I can build great web sites, but there I’m competing against graphic artists, and folks who have much better tools than I do, and can do it faster and cheaper and so on. I keep saying to myself, if I were to work for The Lord, what would I do? That’s a huge question mark too.

I’d probably like to teach, but teaching positions are in the same situation as every other type of job out there. Any openings have 10x as many applicants as there are spaces to fill. And, on top of that, state budgets are being cut left and right, and teachers go first it seems, never administrators. The world is an awful place.

President Obama wants to know how to create jobs. I’ve sent him my ideas. It’s not a cheap thing that I’ve proposed, but it makes sense to folks I’ve talked with. We, in this country, are falling our economic behinds because of one thing: OIL. I’ve written about it for years, told many folks, everyone we meet in fact. It’s our belief that BIG OIL has been running this country for some time now. Nobody can deny any longer that the real reason we’re fighting in the Mideast is because of oil. Sure, our troops over there have become a lightning rod, and we have few terrorist attacks in this country as a result of that, but oil brought the problems on, and oil is why we’re still there fighting.

We need to NOT be dependent on oil any longer – at least foreign oil. We need to be self-sufficient. We need to build up our alternatives. The _best_ one as we see it is Ethanol. Ethanol could literally bail us out overnight. There are dozens of pulp and paper mills that are shutting down in this country (finally) due to the decreased demand for paper. That’s a good thing. But, those same mills have wonderful facilities for making pulp (all of them). And, if you can make pulp, then you can make Ethanol through the cellulosic process. There are bacteria available now that turn cellulose directly to sugar. If you can do that, then making Ethanol is simple! Cellulose is the most abundant organic material on this entire planet folks.

We could be producing millions of barrels of Ethanol within 5 years if we quickly invested as much as we could into turning those abandoned pulp and paper mills into cellulosic ethanol production facilities. They all have rail lines, and they all have the facilities in place to make pulp, the amount of further investment to make them Ethanol production capable is a drop in the bucket compared to the waste of letting them sit there. A few years ago, the average paper milll cost on the order of $500M to build! They also employ about 5,000 people! We could put lots of people back to work! It’s simple to convert any modern car to burn ethanol too, costs less than $500 on average. T.Boone Pickens agrees that oil is our biggest problem, but his solution is natural gas. It’s next to impossible (read that a LOT more $expensive$) to convert a car to burn LPNG! Sure, we could start building cars to burn LPNG, but it will take years to get very many vehicles on the road that are LPNG powered.

There are over 10M cars today that can burn ethanol, and any MODERN car can burn (with no conversion) up to 25% ethanol, no problem. And, at that mix of ethanol, cars actually get better mileage! Isn’t that amazing?

I’ve been studying this stuff, obviously, eh? I’ve sent letters to local energy folks, to T.Boone Pickens, to Presidents Obama, and Bush before him. I’ve sent it to my local state senators. I’ve published articles on the web. Nobody is listening! I’m so frustrated that I could just scream! To get folks to listen, you gotta have money. If you don’t, no matter how good your ideas, nobody listens.

Everybody wants “hybrid” cars. That’s a joke IMO. The reason why – it’s a “high tech” solution to a “low tech” problem. The problem is we simply need to reduce our demand for oil. Converting cars to burn Ethanol reduces your demand for oil to NOTHING! Hybrids reduce your demand by maybe 50%. It’s a pretty simple equation to figure out in my mind. I just don’t see why nobody else sees it that way? Corn prices peaked 2 years ago during the Ethanol “boom.” Then, mysteriously, since we had a “bumper” corn crop, prices dropped to less than half the per bushel price overnight. Ethanol companies folded, went bankrupt overnight. ADM almost went under. They had all locked in corn bushel prices at the “high” (stupidly, I might add). Who do you think is responsible for nearly ruining the Ethanol industry? Do _you_ see a conspiracy in there somewhere?

I’m not a conspiracy theorist, or nut as they say, but I do see one there! Big OIL is trying to keep things the way they are, because they stand to LOSE big if anyone replaces them as “king” in this country. They’ll do ANYTHING to stay in power, and keep the status quo. Sarah Palin wrote an article entitled “Drill.” I agree wholeheartedly with her conclusions in that article too (it’s on the web on Facebook somewhere). If you’d care to read it, it’s available:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Nzc2ZjhjY2MwMWUyM2M4NTM5YWRjYTcwMTEzZTNjMTc

I’m not really in favor of keeping up our dependence on oil, but if we’re going to use it, then it might as well be oil we produce in this country, and not some third world corrupt nation. Pakistan and Afghanistan are not the only corrupt places in this world. IMO, all the third world countries are corrupt. We pay the rulers of those countries (our corporations pay them mostly) so that they can stay in power and continue providing us with stuff we “burn up.” In the meantime, we rape and pillage their countries and leave them as environmental and economic disaster areas for the most part. Third world countries are not like us, they’re 10% wealthy and 90% poor. They have no middle class! There are those who have (few) and those who have not (most), and they either work or starve.

We, in America, have been insulated from all that mostly, but that is the source of terrorism IMO. The “have nots” aren’t taking it any more. They’re fighting back in the only way they can. Um, I should make that the “Imperialist” tendencies of western economies have created a situation where the “have nots” have no hope, so they turn to wanton violence and organized destruction in order to make their needs and beliefs heard.

No, I don’t believe they are terrorists just because they are Muslim any more than I believe standing in my garage makes me a cadillac. Terrorists are just desperate people, who’ve decided to make a political statement through the use of violence. Yes, sometimes folks become Muslim because they have no hope, and that “religion” appears to offer them hope. But, in reality, it can be a front for politically minded types who want to spread violence and terror.

Face it, I became a Christian because I had no hope, but I received love and unconditional acceptance, not a religion of terror and violence. I was fortunate, those who join with “radical” Islam are not so fortunate.

So, do I sound frustrated and angry? You bet!

I could go on and on. But, I’m just boring you with my analysis of the world that I’ve done over the past few years. I’m definitely a thinker and ponderer. This stuff, the real way this world works, since it’s under the control of the enemy of our souls, is not so nice. The world is really a very UGLY place. The only thing beautiful is God, Jesus and The Bible. His love is the only thing that makes it OK anymore. I’m blessed to have a believing wife, but even she gets frustrated with me sometimes. Gee, I wonder why?

=)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Trouble!

We're in trouble here folks.  Not only is the Obama administration claiming "Victory" for contributing so-called 1.7 percentage points to the 3.5% GDP increase last quarter (due to its "Cash For Clunkers" program) but now they are touting how 650,000 jobs were created or "saved" from elimination by the stimulus.  Uh, I have heard that we've lost about 2M jobs this year already, so I don't think anybody can claim "Victory."  And, btw, since when has the government been in the business of making "roadmaps" to recovery?  Isn't business the business of business?

I'm just stupefied by the spin coming out of Washington and specifically the Obama administration, and the host of Democrats who are riding on Obama's coattails.  It's unbelievable what they're trying to do to our country.  Add to that there won't be any real "jobs" recovery until 2012 and we're sitting in red ink folks, a sea of it.  An OCEAN of it.  But, tax and spend policies will drive us right into ruin.  It's going to be a return to Carterism, double digit inflation, massive devaluation of the dollar for us worldwide, and more dependence on BIG government.

I'm trying not to be cynical, really, but this is getting ridiculous.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conservative and Not Cynical

I try not to be cynical, I really do.  But things are just so out of control, it's hard not to be cynical.  Take one of today's news items for example.  "Department of Energy Grants Jump-Start the Smart Grid Toward a Still Undefined Future."  Isn't that typical of our government?  Let's get lots of money out there to folks who make things happen so they can make things happen, even though we don't know where we're going.

On the other side of the coin, our troops are dying in ever increasing numbers in Afghanistan while our President sits there and says:  "We've got to have a solid strategy.  You won't rush me on this one."  Then, we find out that things are "Politics as usual" in the Whitehouse.  Favored Liberals, and "friends" of the administration are being treated to fancy perks, including overnight stays in the Lincoln bedroom and so forth.

So do we really see anything "new" from President Obama's administration?  You can guess my answer to that question.  The President who promised a whole new deal has so far delivered anything but.  Then, he got a Nobel Peace Prize for something he hadn't even done yet!  That's just an insult to the American people in my opinion.  In fact, as I see it, the only things he's done so far in his first 9 months of office is to "undo" all the things the previous administration did.  That's not construction, that's destruction.

Like I said, I try to be conservative rather than cynical, but it's very difficult these days.  Things are going much the same here in my state of Colorado.  Last night I read an article about "Stimulus" funds received to date in our state.  Here is my analysis of that article (http://www.9news.com/rss/article.aspx?storyid=125876):

"Originally, the Governor increased our taxes on vehicles with the understanding that Federal funds were coming to offset some of that for road improvements. If you drive along Hwy 70 and (I assume) other roads in the state you'll notice those BIG signs tooting Governor Ritter's horn about how "Stimulus" money is paying for the road improvements (bridge repairs and such).

"Now, I won't dispute for a MOMENT that those repairs needed to be done, but don't treat me like a fool and tell me that the "Government" is paying for it - I AM! And you are, and you and you and you, all of us are paying for it with higher vehicle fees! And the rest of that "stimulus" money is a total joke. Not if you got your $250 SS check I suppose, and not if you got $500 for increased "fees" at the state schools, that were mostly used to pay for the increased fees at our state schools anyhow, so the Federal government gave and the state took away from those same students - again.

"And that guy can't "account" for it because the program is so HUGE? That's pure and simple FUD, obfuscation, distraction, spin. It's a joke. There is no money coming from the Federal Government to the State, except indirectly, and believe you me, Ritter hopes to get ALL of it back one way or another so he can spend it."

--

I'm tired of the spin doctors.  I'm tired of people in the government lying to me.  The Liberals do nothing but complain about the Conservatives, and how awful we are.  Well, if you ask me, there are those in power who are far worse than the conservatives ever were.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The End of Paper?

E-Books are all the rage these days.  It seems that folks are predicting the end of paper.  "It's finally in sight!"  They say, "The end of paper!  Life for millions of trees!"  It's kind of ridiculous really.  I finished my first e-book the other day, I read _A Tale of Two Cities_ on my iPhone.  It was quite an accomplishment I thought.  The size of the screen at first deterred me a bit, but finally, as I started reading, as long as I had my reading glasses on, and sometimes without, it became quite comfortable.  The fact that the pages were about 1/5 the content of a normal page didn't bother me after a bit either.  I settled in using Stanza (a free e-book reader application) and found it quite comfortable.

Does this really mean  the end of paper?  Hardly.  Folks predicted that paper was dead when computers became big in the 1970's, and then again in the 1980's when "Personal" computers took the stage.  What happened?  We used even MORE paper than we did before.  Folks became obsessed with printing anything and everything.  We printed paper for telling us where to go, we printed paper to tell us what to do, we printed paper to tell us what we did, and we made ZILLIONS of copies because at the same time printing became so easy with a printer connected to every computer, copiers became the BIG thing too.

I've been an environmentally minded person my entire life.  I'm not a die hard tree hugger, but I care about the environment.  I don't believe for a minute that paper is dead, nor is it going away in a hurry.  We are seeing less paper used in certain places that's all.  We are reading fewer newspapers, we are printing less airline tickets.  I get solicited for magazine subscriptions regularly enough to know that we're probably reading as many or more magazines than we used to though.  Publishers are scrambling to sell the darn things, advertisers are eager to sign up and sell anything and everything they can these days with "targeted" advertising.  I get as much junk mail as I used to, but I get fewer bills in the mail.  I get most of my bills electronically these days.  And, I'm probably pretty typical, at least in my generation and folks younger than me.

I stopped reading the newspapers about 15 years ago.  I only read them now when I travel, and then not so much either.  I can get just as good a news summary on my iPhone, or better on my computer, and quicker, and those come with higher quality photos and video, and I don't get newspaper ink all over my hands.  So what is it about me that even though I'm an environmentalist that I don't see the end of paper?  Well, for one, I'm a cheapskate.  I won't pay for an e-book.  If I pay for something, I want it in my hands.  I prefer to goto the Thrift stores and get used books for a dollar or two and read them the old fashioned way.  That's for the most part anyhow.  As I said, I only finished my first e-book the other day, and I've read probably 25 books this year so far.  I read all the time.

I wish we were finally going to stop killing trees for the sake of stuff that mostly ends up in our landfills, however.  I think I'll do a study to figure out how much paper we've cut back in the past few years.  I do think that PDA's and "smart" phones are going to have more impact on paper use reduction than e-book readers will.  There are at least 100M "smart" phones out there in use, and far fewer (say 1M tops) e-book readers at this point, and since smart phones are getting "smarter" I think they'll have the edge over e-book readers.  Face it, most folks are like me, cheapskates who need a device to do more than one thing, and then like me also, they enjoy reading "free" books downloaded from The Gutenberg Project instead of paying a ripoff price for a "new" release.  Or, they still like reading "cheap" books from wherever.

Everyone's all thrilled with the "latest" e-book readers.  I just don't see them surviving the technology revolution for any length of time.  Not until I can pay for an e-book and resell it, or just "rent" it, or get new releases from libraries for free.  I have heard that libraries are doing something with e-books these days, that's another new technology that warrants investigation.  Maybe I'll write a followup to this article.

One last point:  In this country and Canada over the past 150 or so years, an entire industry has grown up around forestry and making pulp and paper products, and there will be some shift in that business.  I have proposed the idea, and continue proposing that we shift some of those paper mills that might be shutting down (invariably there are some that are victims of reduced paper demand) over to Cellulosic Ethanol production.  It could be easily done, for a modest investment.  Most of the industrial facilities are already in place for large scale production of wood pulp, and, if you can make pulp, then you can make cellulosic ethanol.  That's just a thought, a way to not lose all that investment we poured into those paper mills at some point in the past (the average mill costs about $600M in today's dollars).

I for one, would like to see us kill less trees, but it probably ain't gonna happen.  Our forests for the most part are "monoforests" planted as crops essentially.  They are not healthy and nor do they have long-term viability.  They cannot be turned into "old growth" forests.  Rrather we'll see whats happening here in Colorado:  We have a Pine Beetle infestation here that has killed probably half a billion trees, and it's not over yet.  This is a serious national disaster that far outstrips any other environmental issue here in Colorado, yet I've heard nothing about it from the Forest Service.  I wonder why?  Nobody likes to rock the boat, eh?

Anyhow, paper is far from dead and we should probably find other ways to utilize the forests that used to become paper in this country.  That is an idea for you all to think about.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Harvey Milk Day?

You have got to be kidding! Why on earth would somebody honor a fellow for being gay? When it all comes down to it, that’s what the honor is about. It’s not about what he did, or anything spectacular. He wasn’t a war hero, he wasn’t a cop or firefighter who did something worthwhile. He was assassinated. Was that because he was Gay? No, read the (unofficial) historical blurb from Wikipedia:

“Milk served 11 months in office and was responsible for passing a stringent gay rights ordinance for the city. On November 27, 1978, Milk and Mayor George Moscone were assassinated by Dan White, another city supervisor who had recently resigned but wanted his job back. Milk’s rise to political power was as symbolic as it was real. His election signified and was made possible by a shift in San Francisco politics. The assassinations and the ensuing events were the results of continuing ideological conflicts in the city.”

He was killed by a guy who wanted his job back. The last blurb was put in there by an activist. You can tell because it’s not a “fact” but an opinion, and then not even supported with any evidence. Harvey Milk was also responsible for passing laws promoting “Gay Rights.” There’s a HUGE battle today over “Gay Rights.” What the heck is that all about? Do gay people deserve more rights than I do? Or is it that they want rights to simply exist and not be disturbed? The laws now say that purposely targeting a gay person for a crime is a “hate” crime. So, if a mugger attacks me in downtown Denver, it’s just a crime, but if he attacks a gay person, it’s a hate crime? Oh, only if he knew that person was gay and if he was specifically targeting that fellow because he was gay. This is getting complicated. A gay person walks down a street, wearing a gay T-shirt and gets mugged. Now it’s a hate crime because the mugger should have known he was gay…

Now gay people want to get married. Huh? How can you be “married” if the definition of marriage is “man and wife?” I stick to the Bible on this one folks. It’s the only standard we’ve needed as the basis of our laws for the first 233 years of our country, and I don’t think we need to change it now. I’ve stated it before that gay people are out there trying to “prove” there is some sort of gay “gene” or reason for them being gay other than their own choices. What a crock! It should be obvious to anybody that if there were a gay gene, then evolution (if evolution even existed which it doesn’t) would have selected against it and extinguished it. Gay people just don’t want to admit they are responsible for their own choices, and that being gay is a choice, _their_ choice. And, since I don’t believe in evolution, rather I believe the Bible, I believe what God says about being gay: That it’s a perversion and an affront to God.

Don’t get me wrong, that doesn’t mean I don’t like gay people, in fact I love them too. God said we must love each other. But the fact that I’m an alcoholic and a drug addict doesn’t mean I get a free pass to “excuse” my behavior, and that I’m not responsible for the things I did. I am ultimately responsible for all my choices, so are gay people. Their choice to be gay, to have promiscuous sexual behavior and so on, can lead to serious consequences for them, not the least of which is disrespect of their own bodies. STD’s have been around a long time folks. The simple fact is the more people you have sex with, the more likely you are to contract a STD. Gay folks have on average something like 15 times more partners than straight people.

I’m sorry, I don’t miss Harvey Milk, I don’t think he was any kind of “hero” and I certainly don’t agree that we should have a “Harvey Milk Day.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Terrorists In Denver

So, are we surprised? Did you expect to have this fellow walk up to the FBI and announce that he was a terrorist? Even if he was a bad one? Let’s face it folks, terrorists are taking advantage of the fact that 90% of folks, and probably more like 99% are decent, law-abiding citizens. Even those who are not citizens of the U.S., but are living here are probably decent folks for the most part.

I know, I live with them in my neighborhood. Let’s take a look at my neighborhood for a moment, we have white folks, African Americans, Asians, Indians, other Africans, Latinos, so much diversity in fact that I think the white folks are in the minority.

Is that a bad thing? Heck no! We like our neighborhood a lot, and we’re proud to live there. Need we remind you that it was not any racial group in particular that raided the corporate coffers and pilfered yours and my retirement savings in this latest stock market meltdown? Somebody got my money (I wish I knew who)!

Anyhow, my point in this article is that so many folks go around “profiling” and stereotyping after a terrorist gets arrested that we forget that bigotry and racism are the roots of terrorism to begin with.

Jesus commanded us to LOVE ONE ANOTHER. He didn’t ask us to do it, he didn’t pray for us to do it, he didn’t insist that we do it, he COMMANDED us to do it. Just do it!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Loss of Culture

I went to the funeral of our Pastor's Mother-In-Law yesterday.  We first met Lois Profit when she was 85.  She would have been 93 this year.  It's amazing to think that you could meet someone so vibrant and active in life at her age, and that was in the last 7 (almost eight) years of her long life!  She was a dear person, a devoted praying Christian, mother, sister, grandmother, great-grandmother and friend.  We loved her a lot and we miss her, but are comforted by the fact that she's with Jesus now, and with her first-born daughter Wanda Lou who died of cancer in childhood (at the age of 5 if I remember correctly).  Lois was affected deeply by the loss of her daughter so early in life.  It was a wound that never healed until this past Tuesday when she was reunited with her daughter.

Funerals always have that capacity to make us think what's really important in life -- at least Christian funerals do.  We don't dwell on the loss, rather we celebrate the life of the loved one who has gone to be with Jesus.  We remember the impact they had for Jesus' Kingdom on the lives of so many here on this earth.  Lois had a great impact.  She was a prayerful woman, a prayer warrior!  I'm glad I knew her and look forward to seeing her again someday.  What is it that makes us think so much about priorities at funerals that we seem to forget the rest of the time?

Well, we just get "caught up" the rest of the time, at least some of us do.  I don't even have a job right now, and it is terribly difficult to just live some days.  I must fight the urge to panic and the temptation to be depressed, there's anxiety, and self-doubt.  Then I go to Networking events and talk with others who are all facing the same struggles.  In the midst of the struggles you can get distracted, and forget that what's really important is loving God and loving others.  Jesus' commandments to us still apply - even in the midst of the struggle.

So, how did this all get me to the question of "Loss of Culture?"  We were sitting around talking after the funeral, remembering the stories Lois told, how those stories would now mostly be lost, except the few that she had passed on to her children and grandchildren.  Those will be remembered and told, but probably eventually lost.  I read in "Our Daily Bread" yesterday how students retain 5% of the "material" they are presented in the classroom.  However, if the instructor tells a story, the students are likely to remember 50% - that's TEN TIMES MORE - of the stories told!  Was that the real reason Jesus spoke in parables?  Was it because we'd "get it" and remember it better?

We talked at the funeral celebration about our stories, and how those were our "Culture."  Pastor Carol is famous in our congregation for her stories about growing up on Delaney Farm (here in Aurora, Colorado).  She tells humorous and often anecdotal stories about the chickens and other aspects of farm life.  You could see the heartfelt sorrow in her countenance when she said that her grandchildren don't even want to hear those stories anymore.  Why is that you say?

Today's kids, in fact today's "culture" has no interest in these old "stories."  How can that be?  We live in a time of self-absorption, self-indulgence.  We live in the ultimate "Me first" generation.  Today's kids are bombarded with messages, both overt and hidden.  The media is full of sound-bites, video-bites, instant gratifications.  The motto of this generation is "If it feels good, do it!"

What's wrong with that you say?  Well, the problem is that if you live your life seeking instant gratification, then you become a slave to that hedonistic (pleasure seeking) lifestyle.  That's just what Jesus was talking about when he said "You must take up your cross daily, deny yourselves, and follow me."  He wasn't talking about becoming self-abnegating Monks, he was just telling us not to go around all day looking for our next "fix."

I am a drug addict (clean and sober almost 27 years now).  I know the reason I got started doing drugs was because they _feel_ so good.  I would never deny that to anybody.  They _do_ feel great!  But, the problem is, and this is true of all activities that stimulate the "pleasure sensors" in our brain, is that simply seeking to stimulate your pleasure senses all the time is what I call "Self medicating."  You can do it through drugs, alcohol (a drug essentially) sex, food, games, or these days even the Internet!  A life devoted to pleasure seeking is a life enslaved to something outside yourself that has control over you!  _That_ is the problem.

Again, how does this pertain to "Loss of Culture" you ask?  Well, the fact that we have so many in our society enslaved to seeking pleasure in any form, they are distracted from what's really important in life.  We are losing the battle, and are on the verge not only of raising a generation of kids who don't know their Christian heritage, but they won't even know their _Cultural_ heritage!

What is "Culture?"  I would argue that those stories and anecdotes told by older generations are the culture that we should seek to preserve.  Culture is not only the stories, but the art, the appreciation of art, literature, history and so on.  The "appreciation" is passed down verbally through the "Art" of storytelling.  It's something that must be shared and passed from generation to generation.  The good news is that we have the means now to share "culture" from one generation to the next:  We have the Internet and the web. 

In our discussions yesterday at the funeral I think we hit upon a key idea.  The idea is that even with all the mind numbing distractions out there designed to "stimulate the pleasure centers" of our youth generation -- those young people are still struggling with the same questions that man has had since the beginning:  "Who am I?  Where did I come from?  Where am I going?"  Those are still the same basic questions mankind has always dealt with.  Questions of value, of self-worth.  Where will my impact be on this world?  How can I leave a lasting legacy?  Am I special?

My point is proved simply.  In this amazing tool we have (the Internet), there was a simple demonstration recently that shows us that this generation is not completely lost, nor are they so "blinded" with pleasure that they fail to recognize the answer to the question(s) when they see it.  The latest "craze" on the Internet, one of them anyhow, is viral videos.  We love to see people doing dumb things in front of a camera - right?  But, what was the one top viral video of all times (at least in my opinion, everyone agrees it's in the top three)?  Susan Boyle.  I'm not going to argue that Ms. Boyle is a simple woman who came from obscurity to _total_ world fame and glory overnight (literally) because of her talent.  I'm going to argue that she went from obscurity to stardom because she is the definition of what we are looking for!  She answered the question for us!

Ms. Boyle blew away the judges because she "appeared" ordinary.  She also blew them away with her talent.  My argument is that we all have talent, some kind of "gift."  It's in us somewhere.  What we really want to know is:  "Does somebody else value that gift?"  What we want to know is "Am I special?"  Everyone _thought_ Susan Boyle was ordinary.  Susan Boyle did not think so.  She surprised probably the most cynical person on this earth - Simon Cowell!  Why did she blow the judges away?  Because she believed in herself?  Hardly.  She believes in Jesus - that's why.  She is a child of The King and she knows who she is.  She also believed in the "gift" she had, her "talent" because Jesus believed in her singing ability too, in fact He gave her that ability.  Because her "story" was like a fairy tale, the video of her performance, and indeed her rebuking of the cynical judges made history because Susan Boyle is a Child of God in the truest sense.  We were able to capture her story and witness it through the media of the Internet and see that it impacted an entire world.

The answer to my main question then is that we are losing "Culture" everyday.  It dies with a previous generation when they pass and don't leave their legacy, their "stories" behind.  We lose who they were, what they could teach us in a humorous or anecdotal story.  We lose those "parables" if you will.  We are losing them because we live in an age of "instant gratification" and young people are more interested in "media" than relationships.  But, we have a means to capture those "stories" now with the Internet.  We should strive as a people to preserve culture through this media as best we can so that we do not lose the "Culture" of those who went before us.  They have something to teach us.

Even if we don't agree that they have something to teach us, I think even the most cynical would agree that they have a point of view to express.  We should listen to their point of view, to what they have to say.  It's like Tom Brokaw said in his book The Greatest Generation:  He simply had no idea what his parent's generation went through in World War II because they seemed so "ordinary" and they never talked about it.  He never dreamed they had so much to share, that they had struggled so hard, fought so hard and endured so much - for us.  When he realized that, he set about right away to record what those people had to say, what they could teach us about self-sacrifice, loss, about following Jesus to do what is right.  No, Mr. Brokaw may have never spoken directly about Jesus in that book, but almost all the folks he interviewed told how The War was a spiritual battle as much as anything else.

And at the end of World War II we all found out that indeed (as General Eisenhower had said) our people had been on a "Crusade."

That's the bottom line:   Loss of Culture is a loss of our spiritual heritage as well as loss of knowledge of art, history, literature and so on.  We must not lose it!


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »