About Me

Name: Scotty - Denver
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Terrorism!

There have been two incidences lately that warrant comment. First and foremost there was the tragic incident at Ft. Hood, where a lone gunman pulled out a couple guns and started shooting people. Now, I will grant you that he acted alone, and the people he killed were mainly military. One could consider it an act of war in that light, since the targets were mainly military.

But, I choose to fall back on the definition of Terrorism: “The use of force or violence to make a political statement.” It’s pretty simple then, the only question was whether Nidal Hasan was making a political statement. We can answer that question quite simply though. If he did indeed say the words “Allahu Akbar” (“Allah is great”) right before he started shooting as so many have already testified, then it was an act of terrorism.

I would like to state that my wife and I absolutely deplore this wanton act of terrorism, and our hearts and prayers are with the families and friends of those killed in that tragic incident. It was a deplorable act, and one that brings discredit on the man – Nidal Hasan – and those associated with him.

The second incident in recent news that bears scrutiny is the decision by the Obama administration to try the 9/11 “masterminds” as civilians in a Federal Court in New York. This decision is also deplorable, and there is no excuse for giving those “terrorists” and foreigners the same rights as American citizens. Attorney General Holder’s claim that it’s “his” decision is absolutely wrong as well. The decision had already been made to hold military tribunals for all the suspects held at Gitmo. He’s just using President Obama’s (liberal) revisionist policies to change the way things work, and in essence to try to change history.

It is a shameful thing that the current administration has allowed to take place. It is further shameful, and “Politically Correct” and so on to tap dance around the issue of whether Nidal Hasan is indeed a terrorist. He _is_ a TERRORIST!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Washington Out Of Control

OK, enough is enough! We learned this week that “Health Guidelines” for women are being changed. First, it was Mammograms, now it’s Pap smears. The clear goal of this administration is to reduce cost, not focus on health.

Now we read though that FHA is giving out risky loans in “wealthy” areas. There was a fellow quoted this morning in the NY Times who said “I have no idea how we got this big of a loan.” My goodness, isn’t there any oversight of these agencies? Wasn’t that part of the package in the bailout? Less than 12 months ago, that same fellow had to cash in part of his retirement savings to move to Boston!

I tell you, things are spinning out of control, and there is no accountability anywhere. The focus in Washington has shifted to President Obama’s agenda no matter what, and nobody is watching the chicken coop. Add on top of that the big firms on Wall St. are voting themselves HUGE bonuses because of the supposed “recovery” on Wall St. That same recovery has not translated to a recovery on Main St., but do they care? Is it important to Wall St. that unemployment is still on the rise and the average American now, who doesn’t even have a subprime mortgage is now much more likely to lose his home?

This recovery has been about the wealthy, not the lower and middle classes in America. Nothing has been done to support them. I use again the case where in Colorado our Governor stated in no uncertain terms that we were going to get Federal Stimulus monies to help pay for much needed highway and bridge repairs. So, in light of that eventuality he said we should raise auto licensing fees to pay for those repairs now, we’d get the money later from the Fed. We never got a DIME!

Are we being ripped off? Heck no, we needed those repairs, but, and this is a HUGE but, don’t treat me like a fool and count those job numbers in the “jobs saved” category (which you can bet your bottom dollar they are!) by Federal Stimulus monies. The only jobs saved by Federal Stimulus money that this author can see are traders and fund managers and executives on Wall St. The same jerks who got us into this mess to begin with.

I wrote a comment today on a CNN article that at first, I agreed with the TARP program, that it was necessary to “do something.” Now that we’ve seen the results of that “something” I think it would have been better if we’d never done anything at all, and simply let those fools go down with their Wall St. ships. So what if they had gone under? I think the average Joe American would have been better off, since he would have gotten a much sweeter deal in terms of opportunity to refinance his mortgage and modify his debt.

The President and his liberals are minding the store, but the fox has left the chicken coop hours ago with all the chickens and the eggs too.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Daily Rant

Unfortunately, I have no job yet. I had a couple interviews lately, both were very positive, but I didn’t get either job. It’s kind of a drag in my situation that I’ve not been employed at any one employer for longer than 4 years out of the past 20. It makes me a “project” person now, somebody who gets hired when projects are in need, and the first to be let go when things start to tighten up again.

It really has nothing to do with my skills and talents which is the biggest bummer in the situation. I’ve wanted to get in a company where I could be part of a great team. The last place I worked again was a bit behind the curve in terms of software technology even though it was a great team, and that makes me not as “portable” which is the main reason I’ve had great interviews, but am not on their “desirable” list. It’s getting very difficult to compete anymore with the kids coming out of school, all of whom can work 26 hours a day. Me, I just don’t do that anymore, I’m slowing down as I am nearing 50. It’s probably time to figure out something else.

I’d love to goto work full time for The Lord too, but doing what? It’s a hugely uncertain time of life when you’re stuck in the place where you don’t need (or want) lots of money anymore. Heck – I just want a job! I don’t want to start completely over doing anything. I tried that 5 years ago, went back to work in something totally different (Home Depot) and I didn’t fail, but the stress of walking 8 hours a day on concrete floors nearly ruined my feet and ankles. My body is just not used to that kind of abuse. I got tendonitis in my elbows right away too from lifting doors and windows over my head. That was a lot easier to deal with than my feet though.

So, I’m not much cut out for manual labor, I’m still plenty strong, but it’s just that a constant 40 hrs/wk would likely break my body down in a hurry. I’ve not done anything else besides software in the past 25 years. I can build great web sites, but there I’m competing against graphic artists, and folks who have much better tools than I do, and can do it faster and cheaper and so on. I keep saying to myself, if I were to work for The Lord, what would I do? That’s a huge question mark too.

I’d probably like to teach, but teaching positions are in the same situation as every other type of job out there. Any openings have 10x as many applicants as there are spaces to fill. And, on top of that, state budgets are being cut left and right, and teachers go first it seems, never administrators. The world is an awful place.

President Obama wants to know how to create jobs. I’ve sent him my ideas. It’s not a cheap thing that I’ve proposed, but it makes sense to folks I’ve talked with. We, in this country, are falling our economic behinds because of one thing: OIL. I’ve written about it for years, told many folks, everyone we meet in fact. It’s our belief that BIG OIL has been running this country for some time now. Nobody can deny any longer that the real reason we’re fighting in the Mideast is because of oil. Sure, our troops over there have become a lightning rod, and we have few terrorist attacks in this country as a result of that, but oil brought the problems on, and oil is why we’re still there fighting.

We need to NOT be dependent on oil any longer – at least foreign oil. We need to be self-sufficient. We need to build up our alternatives. The _best_ one as we see it is Ethanol. Ethanol could literally bail us out overnight. There are dozens of pulp and paper mills that are shutting down in this country (finally) due to the decreased demand for paper. That’s a good thing. But, those same mills have wonderful facilities for making pulp (all of them). And, if you can make pulp, then you can make Ethanol through the cellulosic process. There are bacteria available now that turn cellulose directly to sugar. If you can do that, then making Ethanol is simple! Cellulose is the most abundant organic material on this entire planet folks.

We could be producing millions of barrels of Ethanol within 5 years if we quickly invested as much as we could into turning those abandoned pulp and paper mills into cellulosic ethanol production facilities. They all have rail lines, and they all have the facilities in place to make pulp, the amount of further investment to make them Ethanol production capable is a drop in the bucket compared to the waste of letting them sit there. A few years ago, the average paper milll cost on the order of $500M to build! They also employ about 5,000 people! We could put lots of people back to work! It’s simple to convert any modern car to burn ethanol too, costs less than $500 on average. T.Boone Pickens agrees that oil is our biggest problem, but his solution is natural gas. It’s next to impossible (read that a LOT more $expensive$) to convert a car to burn LPNG! Sure, we could start building cars to burn LPNG, but it will take years to get very many vehicles on the road that are LPNG powered.

There are over 10M cars today that can burn ethanol, and any MODERN car can burn (with no conversion) up to 25% ethanol, no problem. And, at that mix of ethanol, cars actually get better mileage! Isn’t that amazing?

I’ve been studying this stuff, obviously, eh? I’ve sent letters to local energy folks, to T.Boone Pickens, to Presidents Obama, and Bush before him. I’ve sent it to my local state senators. I’ve published articles on the web. Nobody is listening! I’m so frustrated that I could just scream! To get folks to listen, you gotta have money. If you don’t, no matter how good your ideas, nobody listens.

Everybody wants “hybrid” cars. That’s a joke IMO. The reason why – it’s a “high tech” solution to a “low tech” problem. The problem is we simply need to reduce our demand for oil. Converting cars to burn Ethanol reduces your demand for oil to NOTHING! Hybrids reduce your demand by maybe 50%. It’s a pretty simple equation to figure out in my mind. I just don’t see why nobody else sees it that way? Corn prices peaked 2 years ago during the Ethanol “boom.” Then, mysteriously, since we had a “bumper” corn crop, prices dropped to less than half the per bushel price overnight. Ethanol companies folded, went bankrupt overnight. ADM almost went under. They had all locked in corn bushel prices at the “high” (stupidly, I might add). Who do you think is responsible for nearly ruining the Ethanol industry? Do _you_ see a conspiracy in there somewhere?

I’m not a conspiracy theorist, or nut as they say, but I do see one there! Big OIL is trying to keep things the way they are, because they stand to LOSE big if anyone replaces them as “king” in this country. They’ll do ANYTHING to stay in power, and keep the status quo. Sarah Palin wrote an article entitled “Drill.” I agree wholeheartedly with her conclusions in that article too (it’s on the web on Facebook somewhere). If you’d care to read it, it’s available:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Nzc2ZjhjY2MwMWUyM2M4NTM5YWRjYTcwMTEzZTNjMTc

I’m not really in favor of keeping up our dependence on oil, but if we’re going to use it, then it might as well be oil we produce in this country, and not some third world corrupt nation. Pakistan and Afghanistan are not the only corrupt places in this world. IMO, all the third world countries are corrupt. We pay the rulers of those countries (our corporations pay them mostly) so that they can stay in power and continue providing us with stuff we “burn up.” In the meantime, we rape and pillage their countries and leave them as environmental and economic disaster areas for the most part. Third world countries are not like us, they’re 10% wealthy and 90% poor. They have no middle class! There are those who have (few) and those who have not (most), and they either work or starve.

We, in America, have been insulated from all that mostly, but that is the source of terrorism IMO. The “have nots” aren’t taking it any more. They’re fighting back in the only way they can. Um, I should make that the “Imperialist” tendencies of western economies have created a situation where the “have nots” have no hope, so they turn to wanton violence and organized destruction in order to make their needs and beliefs heard.

No, I don’t believe they are terrorists just because they are Muslim any more than I believe standing in my garage makes me a cadillac. Terrorists are just desperate people, who’ve decided to make a political statement through the use of violence. Yes, sometimes folks become Muslim because they have no hope, and that “religion” appears to offer them hope. But, in reality, it can be a front for politically minded types who want to spread violence and terror.

Face it, I became a Christian because I had no hope, but I received love and unconditional acceptance, not a religion of terror and violence. I was fortunate, those who join with “radical” Islam are not so fortunate.

So, do I sound frustrated and angry? You bet!

I could go on and on. But, I’m just boring you with my analysis of the world that I’ve done over the past few years. I’m definitely a thinker and ponderer. This stuff, the real way this world works, since it’s under the control of the enemy of our souls, is not so nice. The world is really a very UGLY place. The only thing beautiful is God, Jesus and The Bible. His love is the only thing that makes it OK anymore. I’m blessed to have a believing wife, but even she gets frustrated with me sometimes. Gee, I wonder why?

=)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Trouble!

We're in trouble here folks.  Not only is the Obama administration claiming "Victory" for contributing so-called 1.7 percentage points to the 3.5% GDP increase last quarter (due to its "Cash For Clunkers" program) but now they are touting how 650,000 jobs were created or "saved" from elimination by the stimulus.  Uh, I have heard that we've lost about 2M jobs this year already, so I don't think anybody can claim "Victory."  And, btw, since when has the government been in the business of making "roadmaps" to recovery?  Isn't business the business of business?

I'm just stupefied by the spin coming out of Washington and specifically the Obama administration, and the host of Democrats who are riding on Obama's coattails.  It's unbelievable what they're trying to do to our country.  Add to that there won't be any real "jobs" recovery until 2012 and we're sitting in red ink folks, a sea of it.  An OCEAN of it.  But, tax and spend policies will drive us right into ruin.  It's going to be a return to Carterism, double digit inflation, massive devaluation of the dollar for us worldwide, and more dependence on BIG government.

I'm trying not to be cynical, really, but this is getting ridiculous.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conservative and Not Cynical

I try not to be cynical, I really do.  But things are just so out of control, it's hard not to be cynical.  Take one of today's news items for example.  "Department of Energy Grants Jump-Start the Smart Grid Toward a Still Undefined Future."  Isn't that typical of our government?  Let's get lots of money out there to folks who make things happen so they can make things happen, even though we don't know where we're going.

On the other side of the coin, our troops are dying in ever increasing numbers in Afghanistan while our President sits there and says:  "We've got to have a solid strategy.  You won't rush me on this one."  Then, we find out that things are "Politics as usual" in the Whitehouse.  Favored Liberals, and "friends" of the administration are being treated to fancy perks, including overnight stays in the Lincoln bedroom and so forth.

So do we really see anything "new" from President Obama's administration?  You can guess my answer to that question.  The President who promised a whole new deal has so far delivered anything but.  Then, he got a Nobel Peace Prize for something he hadn't even done yet!  That's just an insult to the American people in my opinion.  In fact, as I see it, the only things he's done so far in his first 9 months of office is to "undo" all the things the previous administration did.  That's not construction, that's destruction.

Like I said, I try to be conservative rather than cynical, but it's very difficult these days.  Things are going much the same here in my state of Colorado.  Last night I read an article about "Stimulus" funds received to date in our state.  Here is my analysis of that article (http://www.9news.com/rss/article.aspx?storyid=125876):

"Originally, the Governor increased our taxes on vehicles with the understanding that Federal funds were coming to offset some of that for road improvements. If you drive along Hwy 70 and (I assume) other roads in the state you'll notice those BIG signs tooting Governor Ritter's horn about how "Stimulus" money is paying for the road improvements (bridge repairs and such).

"Now, I won't dispute for a MOMENT that those repairs needed to be done, but don't treat me like a fool and tell me that the "Government" is paying for it - I AM! And you are, and you and you and you, all of us are paying for it with higher vehicle fees! And the rest of that "stimulus" money is a total joke. Not if you got your $250 SS check I suppose, and not if you got $500 for increased "fees" at the state schools, that were mostly used to pay for the increased fees at our state schools anyhow, so the Federal government gave and the state took away from those same students - again.

"And that guy can't "account" for it because the program is so HUGE? That's pure and simple FUD, obfuscation, distraction, spin. It's a joke. There is no money coming from the Federal Government to the State, except indirectly, and believe you me, Ritter hopes to get ALL of it back one way or another so he can spend it."

--

I'm tired of the spin doctors.  I'm tired of people in the government lying to me.  The Liberals do nothing but complain about the Conservatives, and how awful we are.  Well, if you ask me, there are those in power who are far worse than the conservatives ever were.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The End of Paper?

E-Books are all the rage these days.  It seems that folks are predicting the end of paper.  "It's finally in sight!"  They say, "The end of paper!  Life for millions of trees!"  It's kind of ridiculous really.  I finished my first e-book the other day, I read _A Tale of Two Cities_ on my iPhone.  It was quite an accomplishment I thought.  The size of the screen at first deterred me a bit, but finally, as I started reading, as long as I had my reading glasses on, and sometimes without, it became quite comfortable.  The fact that the pages were about 1/5 the content of a normal page didn't bother me after a bit either.  I settled in using Stanza (a free e-book reader application) and found it quite comfortable.

Does this really mean  the end of paper?  Hardly.  Folks predicted that paper was dead when computers became big in the 1970's, and then again in the 1980's when "Personal" computers took the stage.  What happened?  We used even MORE paper than we did before.  Folks became obsessed with printing anything and everything.  We printed paper for telling us where to go, we printed paper to tell us what to do, we printed paper to tell us what we did, and we made ZILLIONS of copies because at the same time printing became so easy with a printer connected to every computer, copiers became the BIG thing too.

I've been an environmentally minded person my entire life.  I'm not a die hard tree hugger, but I care about the environment.  I don't believe for a minute that paper is dead, nor is it going away in a hurry.  We are seeing less paper used in certain places that's all.  We are reading fewer newspapers, we are printing less airline tickets.  I get solicited for magazine subscriptions regularly enough to know that we're probably reading as many or more magazines than we used to though.  Publishers are scrambling to sell the darn things, advertisers are eager to sign up and sell anything and everything they can these days with "targeted" advertising.  I get as much junk mail as I used to, but I get fewer bills in the mail.  I get most of my bills electronically these days.  And, I'm probably pretty typical, at least in my generation and folks younger than me.

I stopped reading the newspapers about 15 years ago.  I only read them now when I travel, and then not so much either.  I can get just as good a news summary on my iPhone, or better on my computer, and quicker, and those come with higher quality photos and video, and I don't get newspaper ink all over my hands.  So what is it about me that even though I'm an environmentalist that I don't see the end of paper?  Well, for one, I'm a cheapskate.  I won't pay for an e-book.  If I pay for something, I want it in my hands.  I prefer to goto the Thrift stores and get used books for a dollar or two and read them the old fashioned way.  That's for the most part anyhow.  As I said, I only finished my first e-book the other day, and I've read probably 25 books this year so far.  I read all the time.

I wish we were finally going to stop killing trees for the sake of stuff that mostly ends up in our landfills, however.  I think I'll do a study to figure out how much paper we've cut back in the past few years.  I do think that PDA's and "smart" phones are going to have more impact on paper use reduction than e-book readers will.  There are at least 100M "smart" phones out there in use, and far fewer (say 1M tops) e-book readers at this point, and since smart phones are getting "smarter" I think they'll have the edge over e-book readers.  Face it, most folks are like me, cheapskates who need a device to do more than one thing, and then like me also, they enjoy reading "free" books downloaded from The Gutenberg Project instead of paying a ripoff price for a "new" release.  Or, they still like reading "cheap" books from wherever.

Everyone's all thrilled with the "latest" e-book readers.  I just don't see them surviving the technology revolution for any length of time.  Not until I can pay for an e-book and resell it, or just "rent" it, or get new releases from libraries for free.  I have heard that libraries are doing something with e-books these days, that's another new technology that warrants investigation.  Maybe I'll write a followup to this article.

One last point:  In this country and Canada over the past 150 or so years, an entire industry has grown up around forestry and making pulp and paper products, and there will be some shift in that business.  I have proposed the idea, and continue proposing that we shift some of those paper mills that might be shutting down (invariably there are some that are victims of reduced paper demand) over to Cellulosic Ethanol production.  It could be easily done, for a modest investment.  Most of the industrial facilities are already in place for large scale production of wood pulp, and, if you can make pulp, then you can make cellulosic ethanol.  That's just a thought, a way to not lose all that investment we poured into those paper mills at some point in the past (the average mill costs about $600M in today's dollars).

I for one, would like to see us kill less trees, but it probably ain't gonna happen.  Our forests for the most part are "monoforests" planted as crops essentially.  They are not healthy and nor do they have long-term viability.  They cannot be turned into "old growth" forests.  Rrather we'll see whats happening here in Colorado:  We have a Pine Beetle infestation here that has killed probably half a billion trees, and it's not over yet.  This is a serious national disaster that far outstrips any other environmental issue here in Colorado, yet I've heard nothing about it from the Forest Service.  I wonder why?  Nobody likes to rock the boat, eh?

Anyhow, paper is far from dead and we should probably find other ways to utilize the forests that used to become paper in this country.  That is an idea for you all to think about.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Harvey Milk Day?

You have got to be kidding! Why on earth would somebody honor a fellow for being gay? When it all comes down to it, that’s what the honor is about. It’s not about what he did, or anything spectacular. He wasn’t a war hero, he wasn’t a cop or firefighter who did something worthwhile. He was assassinated. Was that because he was Gay? No, read the (unofficial) historical blurb from Wikipedia:

“Milk served 11 months in office and was responsible for passing a stringent gay rights ordinance for the city. On November 27, 1978, Milk and Mayor George Moscone were assassinated by Dan White, another city supervisor who had recently resigned but wanted his job back. Milk’s rise to political power was as symbolic as it was real. His election signified and was made possible by a shift in San Francisco politics. The assassinations and the ensuing events were the results of continuing ideological conflicts in the city.”

He was killed by a guy who wanted his job back. The last blurb was put in there by an activist. You can tell because it’s not a “fact” but an opinion, and then not even supported with any evidence. Harvey Milk was also responsible for passing laws promoting “Gay Rights.” There’s a HUGE battle today over “Gay Rights.” What the heck is that all about? Do gay people deserve more rights than I do? Or is it that they want rights to simply exist and not be disturbed? The laws now say that purposely targeting a gay person for a crime is a “hate” crime. So, if a mugger attacks me in downtown Denver, it’s just a crime, but if he attacks a gay person, it’s a hate crime? Oh, only if he knew that person was gay and if he was specifically targeting that fellow because he was gay. This is getting complicated. A gay person walks down a street, wearing a gay T-shirt and gets mugged. Now it’s a hate crime because the mugger should have known he was gay…

Now gay people want to get married. Huh? How can you be “married” if the definition of marriage is “man and wife?” I stick to the Bible on this one folks. It’s the only standard we’ve needed as the basis of our laws for the first 233 years of our country, and I don’t think we need to change it now. I’ve stated it before that gay people are out there trying to “prove” there is some sort of gay “gene” or reason for them being gay other than their own choices. What a crock! It should be obvious to anybody that if there were a gay gene, then evolution (if evolution even existed which it doesn’t) would have selected against it and extinguished it. Gay people just don’t want to admit they are responsible for their own choices, and that being gay is a choice, _their_ choice. And, since I don’t believe in evolution, rather I believe the Bible, I believe what God says about being gay: That it’s a perversion and an affront to God.

Don’t get me wrong, that doesn’t mean I don’t like gay people, in fact I love them too. God said we must love each other. But the fact that I’m an alcoholic and a drug addict doesn’t mean I get a free pass to “excuse” my behavior, and that I’m not responsible for the things I did. I am ultimately responsible for all my choices, so are gay people. Their choice to be gay, to have promiscuous sexual behavior and so on, can lead to serious consequences for them, not the least of which is disrespect of their own bodies. STD’s have been around a long time folks. The simple fact is the more people you have sex with, the more likely you are to contract a STD. Gay folks have on average something like 15 times more partners than straight people.

I’m sorry, I don’t miss Harvey Milk, I don’t think he was any kind of “hero” and I certainly don’t agree that we should have a “Harvey Milk Day.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Terrorists In Denver

So, are we surprised? Did you expect to have this fellow walk up to the FBI and announce that he was a terrorist? Even if he was a bad one? Let’s face it folks, terrorists are taking advantage of the fact that 90% of folks, and probably more like 99% are decent, law-abiding citizens. Even those who are not citizens of the U.S., but are living here are probably decent folks for the most part.

I know, I live with them in my neighborhood. Let’s take a look at my neighborhood for a moment, we have white folks, African Americans, Asians, Indians, other Africans, Latinos, so much diversity in fact that I think the white folks are in the minority.

Is that a bad thing? Heck no! We like our neighborhood a lot, and we’re proud to live there. Need we remind you that it was not any racial group in particular that raided the corporate coffers and pilfered yours and my retirement savings in this latest stock market meltdown? Somebody got my money (I wish I knew who)!

Anyhow, my point in this article is that so many folks go around “profiling” and stereotyping after a terrorist gets arrested that we forget that bigotry and racism are the roots of terrorism to begin with.

Jesus commanded us to LOVE ONE ANOTHER. He didn’t ask us to do it, he didn’t pray for us to do it, he didn’t insist that we do it, he COMMANDED us to do it. Just do it!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Loss of Culture

I went to the funeral of our Pastor's Mother-In-Law yesterday.  We first met Lois Profit when she was 85.  She would have been 93 this year.  It's amazing to think that you could meet someone so vibrant and active in life at her age, and that was in the last 7 (almost eight) years of her long life!  She was a dear person, a devoted praying Christian, mother, sister, grandmother, great-grandmother and friend.  We loved her a lot and we miss her, but are comforted by the fact that she's with Jesus now, and with her first-born daughter Wanda Lou who died of cancer in childhood (at the age of 5 if I remember correctly).  Lois was affected deeply by the loss of her daughter so early in life.  It was a wound that never healed until this past Tuesday when she was reunited with her daughter.

Funerals always have that capacity to make us think what's really important in life -- at least Christian funerals do.  We don't dwell on the loss, rather we celebrate the life of the loved one who has gone to be with Jesus.  We remember the impact they had for Jesus' Kingdom on the lives of so many here on this earth.  Lois had a great impact.  She was a prayerful woman, a prayer warrior!  I'm glad I knew her and look forward to seeing her again someday.  What is it that makes us think so much about priorities at funerals that we seem to forget the rest of the time?

Well, we just get "caught up" the rest of the time, at least some of us do.  I don't even have a job right now, and it is terribly difficult to just live some days.  I must fight the urge to panic and the temptation to be depressed, there's anxiety, and self-doubt.  Then I go to Networking events and talk with others who are all facing the same struggles.  In the midst of the struggles you can get distracted, and forget that what's really important is loving God and loving others.  Jesus' commandments to us still apply - even in the midst of the struggle.

So, how did this all get me to the question of "Loss of Culture?"  We were sitting around talking after the funeral, remembering the stories Lois told, how those stories would now mostly be lost, except the few that she had passed on to her children and grandchildren.  Those will be remembered and told, but probably eventually lost.  I read in "Our Daily Bread" yesterday how students retain 5% of the "material" they are presented in the classroom.  However, if the instructor tells a story, the students are likely to remember 50% - that's TEN TIMES MORE - of the stories told!  Was that the real reason Jesus spoke in parables?  Was it because we'd "get it" and remember it better?

We talked at the funeral celebration about our stories, and how those were our "Culture."  Pastor Carol is famous in our congregation for her stories about growing up on Delaney Farm (here in Aurora, Colorado).  She tells humorous and often anecdotal stories about the chickens and other aspects of farm life.  You could see the heartfelt sorrow in her countenance when she said that her grandchildren don't even want to hear those stories anymore.  Why is that you say?

Today's kids, in fact today's "culture" has no interest in these old "stories."  How can that be?  We live in a time of self-absorption, self-indulgence.  We live in the ultimate "Me first" generation.  Today's kids are bombarded with messages, both overt and hidden.  The media is full of sound-bites, video-bites, instant gratifications.  The motto of this generation is "If it feels good, do it!"

What's wrong with that you say?  Well, the problem is that if you live your life seeking instant gratification, then you become a slave to that hedonistic (pleasure seeking) lifestyle.  That's just what Jesus was talking about when he said "You must take up your cross daily, deny yourselves, and follow me."  He wasn't talking about becoming self-abnegating Monks, he was just telling us not to go around all day looking for our next "fix."

I am a drug addict (clean and sober almost 27 years now).  I know the reason I got started doing drugs was because they _feel_ so good.  I would never deny that to anybody.  They _do_ feel great!  But, the problem is, and this is true of all activities that stimulate the "pleasure sensors" in our brain, is that simply seeking to stimulate your pleasure senses all the time is what I call "Self medicating."  You can do it through drugs, alcohol (a drug essentially) sex, food, games, or these days even the Internet!  A life devoted to pleasure seeking is a life enslaved to something outside yourself that has control over you!  _That_ is the problem.

Again, how does this pertain to "Loss of Culture" you ask?  Well, the fact that we have so many in our society enslaved to seeking pleasure in any form, they are distracted from what's really important in life.  We are losing the battle, and are on the verge not only of raising a generation of kids who don't know their Christian heritage, but they won't even know their _Cultural_ heritage!

What is "Culture?"  I would argue that those stories and anecdotes told by older generations are the culture that we should seek to preserve.  Culture is not only the stories, but the art, the appreciation of art, literature, history and so on.  The "appreciation" is passed down verbally through the "Art" of storytelling.  It's something that must be shared and passed from generation to generation.  The good news is that we have the means now to share "culture" from one generation to the next:  We have the Internet and the web. 

In our discussions yesterday at the funeral I think we hit upon a key idea.  The idea is that even with all the mind numbing distractions out there designed to "stimulate the pleasure centers" of our youth generation -- those young people are still struggling with the same questions that man has had since the beginning:  "Who am I?  Where did I come from?  Where am I going?"  Those are still the same basic questions mankind has always dealt with.  Questions of value, of self-worth.  Where will my impact be on this world?  How can I leave a lasting legacy?  Am I special?

My point is proved simply.  In this amazing tool we have (the Internet), there was a simple demonstration recently that shows us that this generation is not completely lost, nor are they so "blinded" with pleasure that they fail to recognize the answer to the question(s) when they see it.  The latest "craze" on the Internet, one of them anyhow, is viral videos.  We love to see people doing dumb things in front of a camera - right?  But, what was the one top viral video of all times (at least in my opinion, everyone agrees it's in the top three)?  Susan Boyle.  I'm not going to argue that Ms. Boyle is a simple woman who came from obscurity to _total_ world fame and glory overnight (literally) because of her talent.  I'm going to argue that she went from obscurity to stardom because she is the definition of what we are looking for!  She answered the question for us!

Ms. Boyle blew away the judges because she "appeared" ordinary.  She also blew them away with her talent.  My argument is that we all have talent, some kind of "gift."  It's in us somewhere.  What we really want to know is:  "Does somebody else value that gift?"  What we want to know is "Am I special?"  Everyone _thought_ Susan Boyle was ordinary.  Susan Boyle did not think so.  She surprised probably the most cynical person on this earth - Simon Cowell!  Why did she blow the judges away?  Because she believed in herself?  Hardly.  She believes in Jesus - that's why.  She is a child of The King and she knows who she is.  She also believed in the "gift" she had, her "talent" because Jesus believed in her singing ability too, in fact He gave her that ability.  Because her "story" was like a fairy tale, the video of her performance, and indeed her rebuking of the cynical judges made history because Susan Boyle is a Child of God in the truest sense.  We were able to capture her story and witness it through the media of the Internet and see that it impacted an entire world.

The answer to my main question then is that we are losing "Culture" everyday.  It dies with a previous generation when they pass and don't leave their legacy, their "stories" behind.  We lose who they were, what they could teach us in a humorous or anecdotal story.  We lose those "parables" if you will.  We are losing them because we live in an age of "instant gratification" and young people are more interested in "media" than relationships.  But, we have a means to capture those "stories" now with the Internet.  We should strive as a people to preserve culture through this media as best we can so that we do not lose the "Culture" of those who went before us.  They have something to teach us.

Even if we don't agree that they have something to teach us, I think even the most cynical would agree that they have a point of view to express.  We should listen to their point of view, to what they have to say.  It's like Tom Brokaw said in his book The Greatest Generation:  He simply had no idea what his parent's generation went through in World War II because they seemed so "ordinary" and they never talked about it.  He never dreamed they had so much to share, that they had struggled so hard, fought so hard and endured so much - for us.  When he realized that, he set about right away to record what those people had to say, what they could teach us about self-sacrifice, loss, about following Jesus to do what is right.  No, Mr. Brokaw may have never spoken directly about Jesus in that book, but almost all the folks he interviewed told how The War was a spiritual battle as much as anything else.

And at the end of World War II we all found out that indeed (as General Eisenhower had said) our people had been on a "Crusade."

That's the bottom line:   Loss of Culture is a loss of our spiritual heritage as well as loss of knowledge of art, history, literature and so on.  We must not lose it!


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lockerbie Bombing Mastermind Released

The families of the victims of the Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie Scotland in 1988 are not the only ones outraged by the decision of a Scottish Court to release the terrorist convicted of this act of terror.  When you commit an act of terror and kill 270 people, that goes beyond what we call "ordinary" crime.  The man is not an ordinary criminal, he is a terrorist.  Terrorism deserves a special place in our justice system.  Simple justice is not enough for these people.

On the other hand, as a Christian, don't I have compassion for this man and the plight of his people?  Well, yes, of course.  But, that does not condone or in any way validate the act of terrorism he carried out.  He killed innocent people, those who had no quarrel with him or his people, and in fact had no knowledge whatsoever about him, his people, his "cause."  The act of terrorism is defined as: "the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes." 1

Thus, since he used "violence" and "threats" against people who had no knowledge of the reason for his violence or threats, and since he not only ignored the rights of all those people, but in fact took their rights and lives away from them, then we as humanity, representing "justice" have the responsibility to in turn deprive him of his rights forever.  He does not even deserve to be treated as a criminal.  Terrorists should be locked up in a deep dark hole, and never heard from or seen again.  There is no other answer to their use of violence and threats than to simply make them "not exist."  They crossed a line that makes them less than human.

1 - http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorism

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Healthcare Debate

I guess I need to weigh in on this "critical" issue of our times.  I'm not really qualified to comment on the contents of the proposal, but I will say this: There is nothing in the Constitution that "guarantees" healthcare, nor is it wise (IMHO) to think that we can just go out there and mandate it.  Thinking that we can spend $1T on this problem is like thinking that just throwing rocks at a dam will keep it from bursting when the rain is coming down in buckets and your dam is already cracking.

Why don't I believe that throwing money at a problem is a good solution? Because, look what's happened in the past 2 years in our country.  First, we started hearing there were problems in the financial industry.  Then, we heard there were problems in mortgages.  Somehow or other, the "sure thing" that we bet on, that our financial "Gurus" told us we could bet on, were not a good thing after all.  So, mortgage firms started having troubles.  Then bigger lenders, then the insurance giant AIG nearly collapsed seemingly overnight.  Now that we've had 4 score or so banks fail this year alone, we're starting to realize that you cannot simply throw money at a problem and wish it to go away.

At least, if you're smart, you're thinking that way.  Why you ask?  Because, one thing:  Human nature.  We gave money, actually loaned money to those folks on Wall St. to bail themselves out of their difficulties.  What did they do with that money?  Happily paid themselves year-end bonuses that they didn't deserve.

I actually heard some fellow (the Editor of the NY Times Financial News Section if I remember correctly) go on the record saying: "We have to pay those people their bonuses, who else will we get to do these jobs?"  He was referring specifically to AIG at the time, but it's true of all these corporations who allow bonuses to be paid to executives and the like when their companies are in the toilet (not making money and in fact mostly losing money).

How does this relate to Healthcare you might ask?  Well, the roots of our present financial mess go back quite a bit further than just the past 2 years.  Think back to President Clinton when he signed the "law" that forced Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and FHA and HUD to give money to low-income folks for houses that they could neither afford nor could they qualify for loans under "ordinary" conditions.  We started giving those folks 110% loans, and in some cases 115-120% loans, so they could live in houses.  Then, we give them monthly financial assistance on top of that!  It's reminiscent of the 1950's and 1960's when the "projects" were the thing.  These are just "projects" of a different nature.

What happened?  We lost our shirts that's what happened!  You cannot "give" money to folks who are not responsible with it, no matter what.  That's not a racial or prejudicial argument either!  The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.  If you "give" folks (read that entitlement) things they don't deserve, then they just turn around and poop all over you.  I'm being generous here too.

Is it any different for the Government to "give" money to low-income families for housing and big corporations to "give" money to management for a cruddy job of managing other people's money?  I would argue that both are "entitlement mentality."  The definition I'm using here is "getting something that is not deserved."  As a Christian, I'm darned glad The Lord "gave" me salvation as a free gift.  It's something He guarantees to me and gave me freely.  We call that "Grace."  Mercy, on the other hand, is not getting what I deserve (punishment for sin).

So, let me now weave these 2 Biblical concepts into the Healthcare debate.  If, the idea is pervasive in our society that we should get something we don't deserve (something good is an "Entitlement"), and we, as individuals never feel that we should get anything bad, then who pays for it?  If we _all_ deserve something good, then how can it ever be paid for?  Who works for it?  Do we just keep chasing the buck up the chain to the top where President Obama says "I'll just print up $1T and pay for it."

Clearly, we don't all believe in Entitlements.  As a Christian, I am firmly _against_ entitlements in any shape or form.  People should _work_ for what they get.  That's Biblical.  Is there Mercy then in our society?  Do people _not_ get what they deserve?  Absolutely.  Those bumbling idiots from AIG (and most other failing financial firms) should all have been fired.  Heck, I'd stand in line for their job for a whole year!  If all I had to do was get paid half a million dollars a year to run a company into the ground, I could do that job easily!  Let me know where to sign up for it would you?

So, apparently, we do have a notion of "mercy" in our society, and grace.  Are they Biblically based?  Absolutely not, in most cases.  The "World" has turned the Biblical concepts of Grace and Mercy upside down (naturally).  Those idiots on Wall St. are managing my money too, they have my IRA's and 401K monies, and they've fumbled them down to where they're worth about 1/4 what they once were.  My goodness, does that give me any confidence at all that we can "throw money" at the healthcare problem and come up with anything like a solution?

You take a guess at that one.  It's academic in my book.  Absolutely, 100%, never ever ever, forget it Buster, you're looney tunes, No!  No!  No!  NO!

We need to fix what we've got.  Plain and simple.  If there are those who cannot get healthcare, then make it so they can.  But don't pay for it.  We have Medicare and Medicaid for that.  Fix those agencies.  Fix the "inefficiencies" in the system.  Make it accountable.  Make it _not_ an entitlement, and then you've got something you can work with.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Intruder!

Last night about 9p we were startled by a commotion outside in our backyard.  Cheryl was watching "America's Got Talent" while I was upstairs reading.  Suddenly there's a bunch of yelling and screaming and stuff that sounded like a scuffle, and Cheryl's yelling and the woman next door is yelling, and I'm thinking "Get my gun?"  Well, not yet.  Always best to at least try to find out what's going on before jumping to conclusions and trying to be a "hero.

It's a very dangerous thing to rush into an unknown situation with a gun I think.  So, I went downstairs and Cheryl is yelling "It's Ronnette!" (our neighbor) and I can hear it, but Cheryl has the back door open and she's looking outside to try and figure out what's happening, and I realized something is happening in _our_ yard.  So, I get her to close the door, and go upstairs with me so we can get some idea what is happening.  By now, the commotion has moved to the front yard.

The first thing I want to do is get my wife away from the danger and get her to calm down.  So, we open the upstairs window, and there's a bunch of Police Officers down there and we ask what's going on.  They said somebody had run from them and hid in our backyard.  Wonderful I think.

So, I go down there now, and talk to them.  Turns out, there were a bunch of kids in the park (our backyard is to the green belt that leads to the park about 300' away) and they were drinking and using drugs apparently and somebody had called the Police and reported them.  The Police got there, and this young man (about 15 or so) ran and jumped the fence into our yard.  The Police asked if I knew him, never seen him before.  He definitely had no permission to be in our yard.  The kid was obviously intoxicated, was not "sitting still" on the sidewalk, and was not obeying the Police Officers very well.  He was already handcuffed and kept repeating "Sorry! I'm sorry!"  But, it's like, why did you run then kid?  Why did you hop the fence into somebody's yard at 9p at night?

I went out and walked the green belt this morning, and sure enough found a baggie with the remnants of some Marijuana in it.  There's probably another bag or so in my yard, unless the Police searched already and found those.  It's usual behavior for an addict when arrested to empty their pockets.  I'll search my yard real well again.  The kid's friends were dumb enough to try and come up and see him after he was hand-cuffed to which the Police told them "You wanna join the party?  No?  Then GO HOME!"

As far as I know, all parks in the city are closed at dusk.  We've had quite a bit of graffiti lately, as well as broken bottles, break-ins, Cheryl's car was broken into recently.  A neighbor down the street has had his house broken into 3 times lately!  Another with an Electrical Contracting business had his truck broken into and his tools scattered all over the place.  I found a woman's purse half buried in some rocks in that very same park where the Police confronted these kids.  Is it just summertime?  Or is this a sign of escalating youth crime that signals a neighborhood going downhill?

We like our neighborhood very much.  We have wonderful neighbors.  Some of the houses have foreclosed, as in any city in America by now, and we have some that appear rundown, but overall it's a very good neighborhood.  Our house could use some paint by the way.  But, it's very difficult to read.  This is the most crime I can remember in this neighborhood in the 10 years I've been here.  It's very sad to see youth out of control with no moral direction in their lives, doing drugs, drinking, wasting their youth on temporal pleasures.

I have asked myself the question:  "What can I do for these kids?"  What can we do as a community?  I know what our President's answer is:  "Public funded healthcare that pays for abortion on demand."  If the streets are overcrowded, let's just have a few more abortions to prevent some of these unwanted kids.  I ask you:  "Is that a solution?"  It makes me want to puke that the government wants to use my tax dollars to kill unborn babies.  They'll use their rhetoric, and fallacious logic, and sound bites to make it all sound so neat and tidy, like it will clear up all the parks and streets of youth and violence and drugs and such.  But, it won't.

Only you and I, with Jesus' love can do that.

Kids, I'm praying for you.  I hope we get some real leadership in this country that can help young people like you find a direction in life that doesn't include wasting your lives on drugs, alcohol, violence, crime and such.  It leads only to the pit kids.  I was there myself when I was young.  Lord Jesus - help them!  Help us help them!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One More Hill To Climb

I was thinking about my (soon to be) 82 year old mother today, and this thought popped into my head. And I said to myself: “Hey! That would make a neat poem!” So, here goes.

One More Hill To Climb

by Scott deBeaubien


Just one more hill to climb,

Lord – one more hill to climb.

The mountain seemed so far away,

and now I’m nearly there.


One more hill to climb,

Lord – one more hill to climb.

So many have fallen along the way,

some struggle still somewhere.


One more hill to climb,

Lord – one more hill to climb.

The battle’s nearly over now,

I’m still fighting every day.


One more hill to climb,

Lord – one more hill to climb.

I need your strength Oh Lord and how,

much more than I can say.


One more hill to climb,

Lord – one more hill to climb.

Help me get up to the top,

Oh flesh don’t fail me yet.


One more hill to climb,

Lord – one more hill to climb.

Oh catch me Lord so I can stop,

eternal rest I hope to get.


One more hill to climb,

Lord – one more hill to climb.

One more hill to climb,

Lord – just one more hill for me.


Copyright (c) 2009 Scott R. deBeaubien
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Community Theater

Cheryl and I went last night to see my son in “The Pirates of Penzance.”  It was a wonderful production, very professional.  We were quite surprised and pleased.  This is my son’s second acting job with this production company.  The theater you see is in an old 1950’s service station that has been converted to have a stage, lobby and art co-op.  The building that houses the “73rd Avenue Theater Company” also houses a gallery of sorts, a place for local artists to display their works.  It’s quite an interesting enterprise to find in the midst of a more or less rundown part of Westminster.

My son didn’t have a large part in the play, but that wasn’t our only purpose in being there.  We were there to support him and the theater troupe, and the artists and everyone involved in this endeavor.  We believe there are not enough artists in this world.  There is always room for more.  Everyone has a creative side, and it should be the case that we, in our society feel obliged to try to contribute to our society rather than just being good consumers.

Entertainment is HUGE business in our society.  We have gotten to the point where most of us think that we should just be “entertained” all the time.  We expect it of our media, we expect it nearly everywhere we go.  It’s pervasive, from McDonald’s “Happy Meals” (do kids want the food or the toy?) to our News media, where “sensational” is the rule, rather than the exception.

For our honeymoon back in 2000, Cheryl and I were fortunate enough to get to go to Bali.  What an amazing place!  There, several hundreds of years ago, their society flourished because of several factors.  First, they have a nearly ideal climate, and that leads to 3 rice-growing seasons per year.  Next, they are on an island surrounded by waters chock full of all kinds of fish.  You see when there was no hunger to worry about, the people had lots of time for other activities.  They had what we would term a very advanced society that has carried over and become an influence to much of the rest of the world today.  Art is something that almost everyone does in Bali, from the beautiful dancers and musicians who tell wonderful stories, to the carvers and such who produce such common wares as wooden patio furniture to beautiful masks and chess sets.

What was different about the Bali of the past and our present society is where I think we have gone wrong.  In our Western notion, we put more emphasis on pleasure rather than performance.  It’s as if the hedonistic aspects of the “experience” of the art form have overcome the expression of it, and art is no longer valued for what it contributes to society but for how much pleasure it can bring to the individual.  I am not saying there should not be pleasure in art – for art’s sake – but the good of it should be in the expression of it, the sense that we are all participating in producing art, and seeking the higher existential aspects of life, rather than simply existing.

Goodness, I had no idea my feelings about art ran so deep!

What I think though, and this is how this relates to community theater, is that we all should be supporters of those who seek to produce art – in any form.  We must support and encourage them.  When we do, we also are making a stand and saying that what they do is important to us.  I will not, here, get into a discussion of what defines art.  For most of us, that’s not a question.   Community Theater is art, in its best form I believe.  When it’s well delivered, as was last night the case, it’s art, combined with music and literature.  It transcends our daily existence and takes us someplace completely different.  In this case, it took us to England, somewhere in the 19th century, to a place with pirates, beautiful girls, and a man with a conscience.

It’s a beautiful thing.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gay Penguins - Really?

Check out the video on CNN:

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2009/07/16/bush.gay.penguins.kron

Give me a break.  This is more lunacy from the far left.  How on earth could there be such a thing as a “Gay Penguin?”  Or, for that matter, how could any animal be “Gay?”  The gay activists are at it again folks.  They want us to believe that being gay is something you’re born with, or something “evolution” gave us.

Think about it, if there were such a thing as “Gay” genes, wouldn’t they have been naturally selected against if evolution is true?  I mean, seriously, there would not be any gay humans, or gay animals, because they would never reproduce!  Sheesh – you don’t have to think it through very far to realize that.

And I don’t even believe in evolution so what does that say?  From God’s perspective, being gay is an affront to His righteousness.  Why?  Because we were _created_ in His image, to be pure and righteous, one man and one woman joined together, not only to procreate, but to _complete_ each other.

My wife, Cheryl, she completes me, she is my “other half” if that’s how you like to think about it.  Neither half is better, we’re just not complete without one another.  Don’t get me wrong, we’re far from perfect, and I’m farther from it on my own.  I have problems each and every day that I must deal with.  We call that “Sin” and the results of a sinful nature.  I fight the “Old man” inside me (my sin nature) every day. It’s a struggle, thus, a journey and not a destination.

I won’t be perfect until I die, and kneel at the feet of Jesus and kiss his feet and He gives me a big hug and says “Well done, good and faithful servant.”  I hope to get there anyhow.  Like I said, it’s a journey and not an end in itself (being a believer in Jesus Christ).

So, again, what is this nonsense about “Gay Penguins” all about?  The gay community is desperate to prove that they are not responsible for their own behavior.  They are seeking to blame it on some nebulous thing called “Evolution” so that they don’t have to be responsible for their own behavior.  Don’t get me wrong, I don’t hate gay people, in fact, some I’ve met are downright decent folks.  They are simply not following God’s best plan for their lives that’s all.

My daughter recently told me that she and her husband went to DC for a nice afternoon, and were unfortunate enough to arrive on a day when there was a “Gay Pride” day.  Why unfortunate?  Because the gay people, especially the transvestites and so on were downright rude to them, and mean.  They think that freedom means you can be offensive.  Boy, is that wrong.  Sure, freedom of speech means you can say anything you like, but if I find it offensive then I have every right to tell you that you are offensive, and what you stand for is wrong.

So I say again, there is no such thing as a “Gay” animal.  They do not exist, never have, never will.  It’s simply the gay activists desperate to “prove” that their behavior is due to Charles Darwin, and not choice.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »